Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fire Emblem
#4
(13-06-2026, 02:06 PM)Dirty Duck Wrote: I think Awakening was better than Fates, personally. But honestly I've loved every post-Awakening FE, although I haven't played Engage yet but that looked a bit Greatest Hits like and so didn't feel like I was in too much of a rush to play it, Henry got it for me for my bday a couple years ago though so I'll likely play it to prepare for Fortune's Weave.

What about Three Houses felt more complicated to you, @SK8R LUNG? I didn't think anything felt especially more complex than before...I guess the time management aspect does obfuscate the existing stuff a bit but due to my time with the Persona series I didn't find that too daunting. Also, what house did you ally with?

i haven't played Awakening yet, but my guess is i will probably i agree when i eventually do. Fates was just my first experience with the game, so i have a soft spot for it. my gut feeling was that Engage would be more up my alley compared to Three Houses, but i haven't gotten to it yet. 

tbh i picked up Three Houses when i was living in Japan, and during that time i was really focused on using games as a way to study Japanese. but the language of Three Houses is much more advanced than, say, the GBA games, so that probably didn't help. if i played it in english i probably would have been better off haha

oh and i allied with Blue Lions
[+] 1 user Likes SK8R LUNG's post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Fire Emblem - by Dirty Duck - 09-06-2026, 03:34 PM
RE: Fire Emblem - by SK8R LUNG - 13-06-2026, 02:01 PM
RE: Fire Emblem - by Dirty Duck - 13-06-2026, 02:06 PM
RE: Fire Emblem - by SK8R LUNG - 13-06-2026, 02:18 PM
RE: Fire Emblem - by Dirty Duck - 13-06-2026, 07:28 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)