![]() |
|
What are you watching? - Printable Version +- Metal Gear Forums (https://metalgearforums.com) +-- Forum: Other Talk (https://metalgearforums.com/Forum-Other-Talk) +--- Forum: Film & Television (https://metalgearforums.com/Forum-Film-Television) +--- Thread: What are you watching? (/Thread-What-are-you-watching) |
RE: What are you watching? - Helikaon - 17-02-2026 I really hope HBO pivots and starts doing Westeros movies. Like, The Conquest should be a 2.5 hour movie, not a show. There's not enough strory for a full season, and what story there is (Aegon, Visenya and Rhaenys land, wrecks shit) would be pretty boring. But a movie? I wouldn't mind seeing Balerion the Black Dread in full movie glory. RE: What are you watching? - Wayno - 17-02-2026 See, there's theories that I love that probably wouldn't make it to the film. book theory: RE: What are you watching? - Jassassino - 17-02-2026 Tales of Dunk and Egg was on my reading list, be real with me fellas, after the shit show of the GOT TV ending, should I just read these instead of watching the show, or does it look more promising? RE: What are you watching? - tr0nic - 18-02-2026 (22-12-2025, 03:19 AM)Dirty Duck Wrote:(07-08-2025, 10:15 PM)tr0nic Wrote: I don't know what compelled me to do so, but I watched The Matrix: Resurrections (Matrix 4) last night. Not entirely sure what to expect, except badness. But you know what? Wasn't bad. It was actually pretty fun, and at this point Lana Wachowski seemed to be focused on having fun with it rather than entirely making some social commentary. It's in there, for sure, and it's just a bit heavy-handed with it right at the beginning, but then it's just about doing cool Matrix shit. I could really tell that she's had a bunch of unfinished ideas from the original trilogy that she wanted to flesh out. She didn't fully succeed, there's like a dozen concepts introduced that went nowhere and were barely explained despite having a runtime of 2 Hours 30 Minutes, but that's all very par for the course with Matrix movies. Okay, coming back months later to respond to this as I've recently done a rewatch of Resurrections and Revolutions. @starschwar many apologies for not initially responding, that makes sense. I sort of knew that the green tint was in itself a piece of lore, it's a very visible motif in the original trilogy, but I didn't connect at first that the part of the actual Matrix that would cause this green tint could be gone. Like I was expecting it to come back at some point, like the Merovingian did, and was let down when it didn't. But watching again yeah it makes sense that it doesn't make an appearance. New Matrix, new rules. In response to @Dirty Duck's great breakdown of things: My attitude towards New Morpheus totally shifted on this second rewatch. It really struck me this time around how not bringing back Laurence was a direct message to the viewer; this sequel was never going to be exactly what each one of us wanted, and it shouldn't be. The Matrix that we knew is gone, a new Morpheus had to be created to reactivate Neo, and he is almost literally some AI-generated outline of what we knew as Morpheus. He's got the moves, he's Morpheus-shaped, but he looks...Wrong. Indeed, Lana is holding up a mirror and telling us that this highly personalized internet we've found ourselves stuck with has changed us, as we have changed it. And so we don't get a truly "new" Matrix movie, we get a highly stylized rehash to remind us of what was previously said, and while Lana has made the universe bigger, the story has been made smaller and properly focused on Neo and Trinity. The Messiah messaging, the insane Atlas weight of humanity on Neo's shoulders is also the burden of The Matrix as a franchise and the expectations of everyone that loves it. At the end of the day it is a story about humans, and at the core of being human is finding love and some kind of purpose. It's worth everything. I also found The Analyst angle entirely unnecessary. If all that was really left over of the original Smith is just pure hatred for Neo, then why recycle him at all? Adding more layers to the Matrix to disorient Neo further seems way, way more efficient and effective than going balls to the wall with it when the layers start to inevitably break down again. Like, The Machines are sentient. They have some concept of trust amongst themselves, how the fuck do any of them trust Smith ever again? Someone must have known this would end badly if the goal is to contain Neo. Now, I'm probably going to butcher some lore interpretation here, but I'm a big fan of the oft-theorized "Nightmare Matrix" theory. That is, in a previous iteration of the Matrix, the world itself was filled with programs that manifested as mythical monsters (vampires, werewolves, ghouls, etc.) to maintain a more direct control over humanity and the visual representation of the Matrix. The Merovingian was the Operating System of this Matrix, and his henchmen were previously the Agents that manifested as these monsters. Largely, the theory makes my imagination run wild because of the possibilities. If there were previous Agents, a previous OS, then there was possibly a previous "The One". At the center of the Machine race is something that continues to perpetuate these concepts of Agents, of Neo, of Humanity endlessly resisting The Matrix. Possibly to perpetuate itself. Matrix 4 seems to also somewhat support that with its rehashing of previous scenes with new actors. The only way to keep things balanced is to allow controlled detonation from time to time. I also think that the Human-Machine alliance is a very logical, very good progression in the story, and while it doesn't reference anything directly, finally the Matrix fans get to see some level of crossover between Animatrix and the mainline films. Humanity is learning from the mistakes of the Second Renaissance and the Machine War, that's what it's all about baby. Evolve and adapt. I hate that it's such a boring slog part of the film, that had some serious potential. All in all though, yeah not as disappointed with Matrix 4 as I even previously was. What it made me think and feel makes the boring parts worth it. RE: What are you watching? - starschwar - 18-02-2026 @tr0nic , you make some interesting observations. Morpheus being a Smith replica that chooses to be a Morpheus is an interesting concept. The movie's persistent use of mirrors as both imagery and means to progress the plot are not accidental. There's a lot individual ideas in Resurrections that I like, but just about anything that isn't about Neo and Trinity feels underdeveloped. I know a lot of material was cut for time, and I hope someday, maybe, a longer cut will be released (such as one that was confirmed to have been screened for critics) that will let these ideas breathe more. I gave it three chances, and it never clicked with me. I've made peace with it. Maybe someday I'll give it another go, especially before that fifth movie comes out. But I can live with disliking a Matrix movie. I'm still a fan for life. I've come back to lesser series with far worse films in them! RE: What are you watching? - tr0nic - 19-02-2026 (18-02-2026, 11:44 PM)starschwar Wrote: @tr0nic , you make some interesting observations. Morpheus being a Smith replica that chooses to be a Morpheus is an interesting concept. The movie's persistent use of mirrors as both imagery and means to progress the plot are not accidental. There's a lot individual ideas in Resurrections that I like, but just about anything that isn't about Neo and Trinity feels underdeveloped. I know a lot of material was cut for time, and I hope someday, maybe, a longer cut will be released (such as one that was confirmed to have been screened for critics) that will let these ideas breathe more. See I'm right there with you. 15 minutes into this second rewatch, I was already telling myself "Fuck why am I watching this again? Just watch clips on youtube." Nothing else on this planet does this to me like Matrix films do, where I'm sitting there thinking "Why am I watching this again?" Then days later I'm still thinking about all these ideas that were presented to me, generally unfinished, and I'm captivated all over again. RE: What are you watching? - starschwar - 19-02-2026 I'll say this. While I do dislike Resurrections, it is an incredibly memorable film, even the parts that I find unsatisfying. I have seen much worse movies since that my brain has already "taped over". RE: What are you watching? - Wayno - 23-02-2026 I'm so glad we get the next season of A Knight of the Seven Nine Kingdoms next year rather than a two year wait. It's been such a beautiful, sweet show. An absolute palate cleanser and I have zero complaints about any deviation from the source material and everything they added was wonderful. I could talk about all the cool additions in the final episode all day. Six 30 minute episodes was the perfect decision. RE: What are you watching? - SammyIsNotCool - 26-02-2026 Re-watched 'The Batman VS. Dracula' a couple days ago on a whim, and it's still definitely in my list of top 5 animated batman films. The show (The Batman 2004 TV Series) had a lot to live up to with it being the first follow up Batman Series outside of the BTAS universe, but I believe it asserted itself well with its own unique visual style and charm. I personally love a lot of the villain designs (Joker's outfit from the pilot episode especially, I have a figure of it somewhere in my room) and found it to be special in how it's the only Batman animated show (to my knowledge) where Batman undergoes a series long character arc. It begins with him working alone in season 1, cooperating with the police more in season 2, partnering with Batgirl in season 3, Robin in season 4 (yes it is rather strange that they added Batgirl before Robin, but that is because they were not allowed to use the character until after the Teen Titans show was cancelled), and rounding off with Batman being a part of the justice league for all of season 5. Also its Clayface is my favorite animated variant of the character. This all has nothing to do with the movie ![]() I have not a single analysis bone in my body so all I can say is that I think it looks cool and that Batman's design gives off very nice creature vibes. The blood bank scene is probably my favorite part. ![]() Very angular. I love his oversized cape. It is perfectly understandable how rumors of a giant bat creature being spotted in Gotham began to spread amongst the criminal underbelly when the guy looks like *this*. RE: What are you watching? - NateDog - 26-02-2026 Rewatched Anchorman. Leelee was not very impressed and it wasn't as funny as I remembered, but did at least finally understand why I will on occasion say to her "why don't you go back to your home on whore island". |